[ad_1]
New Delhi: In an unprecedented occasion, Justice Abhijit Gangopadhyay of the Calcutta Excessive Courtroom has moved the Supreme Courtroom in gentle of the division bench of the HC staying a few of his current orders.
A single bench of Justice Gangopadhyay had directed the CBI to probe alleged irregularities in recruitment of lecturers and non-teaching workers in authorities faculties in West Bengal. Nonetheless, the order was stayed by the HC division bench.
Following that, the only bench sought an account of the movable and immovable property of Shanti Prasad Singh, then an advisor to the SSC, in an alleged trainer recruitment case. However the division bench stayed that order too.
Within the wake of those incidents, Justice Abhijit Gangopadhyay sought the intervention of the apex court docket, alleging that the division bench was repeatedly appearing as a stumbling block to the orders of the only bench for the “good thing about another person”.
On Tuesday, Justice Gangopadhyay directed that the paperwork of the 4 CBI probe circumstances filed by him within the final couple of recruitment circumstances and the keep order granted by Justice Harish Tandon’s division bench on them be forwarded to the Chief Justice of the Supreme Courtroom and the Chief Justice of the Excessive Courtroom.
In accordance with Justice Gangopadhyay, “Let the nation see what is going on on with the unlawful employment. Let the entire thing be judged.”
On the similar time, in a written administrative directive, Justice Gangopadhyay mentioned {that a} lawyer had come to him on Tuesday to talk on behalf of an influential politician in all these circumstances. He folded his arms and apologised, asking him to forgive him.
Justice Gangopadhyay mentioned, “I gave him a cup of espresso and advised him to go. If the Chief Justice desires to know the title of that particular person, I’ll say so.”
In the meantime, the division bench of Justice Harish Tandon directed that the counter-sealed envelope of former SSC adviser Shanti Prasad Singh’s property not be opened.
“My arms are being tied repeatedly,” the HC choose mentioned, including, “I attraction to the Chief Justice of the Calcutta Excessive Courtroom and the Chief Justice of the Supreme Courtroom to look into the matter and probe the continuing corruption.”
Such an incident has by no means occurred within the historical past of the Calcutta Excessive Courtroom the place a choose has approached the Supreme Courtroom alleging {that a} keep order was being issued on his judgement.
[ad_2]
Supply hyperlink
